Valve index fov reddit. " Some could get 92-94 but most saw 90 degrees.

Valve index fov reddit In Figure 2 inter lenses distance = 2. how about Nvidia shadow play Its time for an upgrade. The largest FOV of the Pimax is much larger, about 160 degrees horizontal and 120 degrees vertical. , 50 - 110 degrees) 373 votes, 70 comments. Index for me wins in FOV (very slightly) and audio (again, very slightly). com]. I believe 5k+ 144hz is limited to small FoV 120 wide. The index can let you play as long as you want as you can charge your controllers from the headset usb whilst playing. I used the "Base Station FOV… Overly exaggerating the figure to THAT kind of an extent just SCREAMS "I'm a fanboy trying to defend my $1000 Index purchase!". Again, more of it should be visible to most people than with the normal Vive/Pro setup. Based on my measurements of Index images using a program called FSpy, I don’t expect the rendered FOV of the Index to be much different than the Vive. Im really hoping we'll see similar or better fov to the index, G2 resolution, wireless, eye tracking and pancake lenses in the next year to compete with meta and others. I also tilt the hmd down and there is a big difference for me from just that, but I never thought about cutting the gasket. While the Valve Index is 106 degrees horizontal and 130 degrees vertical. Today marks my 1-year anniversary of owning a Valve Index! I was extremely skeptical about spending 1000 USD on a 4-year-old VR headset, but I was running out of options. Each headset I've used so far fell short in at least four different ways. Quest FOV and Valve Index FOV are very similar, Valve Index might be wider but at the end of the day you have the same experience. But yeah the official numbers from Valve for Index base stations is 160x115. As per my title saying, I can at least drop my glasses using the index, but I still cannot deny the fact to be disapointed by the Fov limitation. Really hoping Valve comes out with BMR in a floating ear headphone-style one day like they had in the concepts (seen on the Valve write-ups on Index audio). When I moved from Valve Index to Quest Pro the vertical FOV was lowered significantly. Valve and the Index embrace modding with things like the frunk. Compared with the index the quests fov feels super restrictive. We need more of them. I've done a lot of A/B comparison. 9amps(4. 4. You just need to add a power source, since PC's have a USB standard of only 0. HTC Vive with thick cover give same FOV like Oculus - 89-90 degree. The index is a great headset, but after using a Pimax (and trying it on small FOV with is roughly equivalent to Index FOV) I wouldn't get an Index it if you can afford a Pimax, when you live in Europe try to get the Pimax through an European Onlineshop Index. I feel like if it was just 20 degrees wider it would get rid of the scuba mask feeling for the most part. x chips to become more prevalent (there are a few available in small sample quantities) as well as gpus with dp 2. " So it's simple to calculate the Valve Index FOV, right? Just add 20° to 110° and you get 130°, right? Not really. I ended up returning it and sticking with my HTC Vive until the Valve Index released. That is RIGHT way, BUT Valve has symmetrical lenses on photo (Figure 2). If we simply got an Index at a wider field of view with no resolution changes, it'd look worse. I have my Index setup in my living room and when someone plays it I turn on the "Display VR View" option in the SteamVR Hub so I can watch them. The Index is thought to address the high end market. Used doesn't support Valve, and new is the cost of a full low-mid level gaming PC, so I've just gone without VR for the moment. Vive quoted diagonal FOV is 110 and Horizontal is was measured at 110 (doc ok) so we will assume a similar setup with the Index. On the other hand, the Meta Quest 3 is a lot cheaper and seems to be the most popular headset at the moment. Yes. g. The total is simply adding those values back together. So after Capcom double-busted the FOV Trainer shortly after the holidays it looks like everything is back to normal after CivilWolf updated the indispensable tool. Stereo Overlap and per-eye FoV Using TestHMD, Index has been measured to 108 degrees horizontal and 132 degrees vertical. Index has screen door and also can't push clarity into high res sampling like Q3 can I'm running on RTX 4080 with wifi6 and virtual desktop at h264+ at 500mbps and ultra or godlike settings. For me at least! I have Index and Quest now and used to own pimax 5K+ and a Vive. I'm currently rocking 3. The Comfort, it's lighter, but it lacks the eye-relief. I love the FOV, IPD, Resolution, Headstrap, Speakers and mic. Save your money. Pimax 5k+ is 2560×1440/eye total 5120×1440. Both Headsets have a max 144hz refresh rate. is the only way with the valve index to maximise my FOV ( lenses closer to my eye ) actually using contact lenses ? is there something I did not think of ? Any real answer is appreciated here :) Valve index Pros: Bigger FOV! Clear image (but not that clear as in Quest 2 apparently) Better blacks than in quest 2 Supposedly the best affordable VR headset nowadays better strap from stock Cons: More expensive (BUT I would sell the Vive headset and maybe wands if I got the Index, so it easily might be the cheaper choice) Im using my valve index for quite some years now and it has been the best headset (for me) so far. Having the audio solution the likes of the index and HP Reverb keeps your head cool. Honestly, my plan is to sell all of my other headsets except for three - the Odyssey+, Pimax XR, and Index (not counting the Quest because it’s in a different category) and primarily use the Index except for in games like Skyrim Vr where the inky blacks and wide FOV really do add a lot to the game, and then keep the Odyssey as a loaner for Posted by u/duss76 - 2 votes and 13 comments Yes, for Valve's patent they filed a year ago where they are using two fresnel lenses back to back. The width of the coverage cone is quite generous at 160 degrees left to right. Honestly, I don't think the 800€ price difference is worth it for the Index right now. Since the bigscreen beyond is about to launch in a few months Im really thinking about replacing it for the index because I have heard and seen super many good reviews on it. For example I've been using 95% FOV and 101% or 102% world scale in Dirt Rally 2 - The 5% FOV change is unnoticeable to me but allows improved performance and %102 world scale has made my perception of the car and world more real improving my instinctual driving reaction to narrow roads and corners. 15% I have both: Valve Index: Just works. At the time, going from the Vive to the Index was an unmistakable upgrade. " Some could get 92-94 but most saw 90 degrees. the audio solution is the same as the vive pro which is pretty good, and which the valve index copied from the pro 🤦‍♂️ VR HMDs/Headsets I've Owned: Quest 2, Quest 1, HP Reverb G2, Quest 3, Valve Index, Original Vive. The Index 2. P. I first googled valve index burns and then Gray rectangles with the valve index head mounted display. 7*radius or 1. So if you’re already using a thin facial interface, don’t expect an additional 20° when switching to the Index. From like 109 of Index to 96 on Quest Pro (Quest 3 also has 96). It's the only headset (and the 12k) that according to the specs and released information doesn't make you sacrifice any one thing for any other thing. The G2 has a better display no doubt, but the index is much more immersive in that way. But Quest 2 vs. 5 mm. Their new upcoming headset is supposedly going to have human level FOV but at the cost of being almost 3 times as much as an Index. I even greatly prefer Index with super-sampling to my PSVR2, even though PSVR2 has oled and 80% higher panel res. I pre-ordered a G2 and returned it after three weeks. Yeah this app was super helpful for visualizing how much tracking range the 2. Quest 3 does have better and more high-res lenses, but I have no issues with my Index thanks to super-sampling with an RTX 3090. So, I'd rather resolution Increase before FOV. Comfort is reasonable, however to get a good focus (Sweet spot) for my head the Dec 16, 2020 · The FOV is almost as large as the Index' but doesn't beat it. Do you know any way to change the settings? Bonus Points if yo know how to - Change the volume of the audio mirror without changing the index volume - let her hear my voice when i speak trough my own mic According to Pimax reviews, users only had issues with object rendering past about 170 degrees FOV. The advertised 130° is the diagonal fov, which is just a marketing buzzword and not worth to take into consideration whatever headset you looking at. Reply reply As an owner of both I will say the quest 2 sits on the shelf 99% of the time. Would I really recommend an Index ehhhh not really It's a premium device and while I think it's the best overall package on the market atm it's expensive. In cinema mode it looks better than my 1080p 65" TV, I still love the Index, and I'm happy with the image quality, but if you do an A/B comparison the PSVR2 takes the win on this one. Bought plano lenses for around 50€ and expected real good quality for that money, what came was cheap 3d printed sockets, not cleaned, had to remove rests from bad printing that would scratch my index. We need the horizontal FOV which we don't have just rumoured diagonal numbers. The index in my opinion is much better hardware including real built in headphones, wider fov, a head strap that is actually comfortable, expandability for full body, better tracking, and a higher refresh if you can push it. I wish more manufacturers would follow their lead. Originally uploaded this with a misleading title: my bad. Thank you for your submission to r/ValveIndex gorefingur!. Because vertical FOV, was not symmetrical for me, the measurements in the chart were made in two passes, once for the top and once for the bottom without removing or adjusting the HMD. My last purchase was a Pimax 5K super at Christmas time which was cheaper than the index. Not to mention the Index FOV is way bigger and you can actually adjust the screen distance to start seeing the edges of the screen. The FOV is significantly larger on the Index, and the overall visual presence feels stronger due to the edge clarity and improved refresh rate. From what I can tell the Valve Index is 1600x1440 144hz while the Pimax 5k Super is 2560x1440 (higher FOV but same pixel density) 120hz. Be ready to be frustrated when setting it up to find your IPD. If you want true wide FOV, as other's pointed out, Pimax is really the only company going for massive FOV. 5%, and Quest 3 enters at a very low 0. Immediately made the Index more clear/enjoyable for me. The adjustable ones like index and Vive move the screens when you adjust so there shouldn't be much if any loss so long as you fit in the maximum IPD so it shouldn't be an issue unless you're in the mid to high 70s range. I honestly think because it's so damn wide, for people settling with 2 base station setups it might be better to please them opposite each on the flat side of the play space instead of the corners. Same here, Index is amazing for fov, ipd-slider, speakers, finger tracking, base station tracking, comfort, native Steam driver support (about 20-30% faster using same res compared to many other hmds not using native Steam drivers), 144 Hz, and the res is great too. more GPU performance than the OpenVR capture plugin, and doesn't allow you to control the blend or the FOV iam curious about that GPU performance, i tought that display VR view just mirroring the eyes which you have in HMD, how much do you think then it eats? in both possible scenario - mirror/record only right eye, or mirror/record both eyes with right dominant. The Vive Pro 1 is comparable to the Index resolution wise but the OLED panel is much better than the index panels. Results - JDI panels 2160 x 2432 per eye with 120deg FOV = 18 - JDI panels 2160 x 2432 per eye with 135deg FOV = 16 - Vive Pro Panels 1440 x 1600 per eye with 120deg FOV = 12 For fixed IPD screens or those that don't move the screen then anything but an IPD of 64 will have worse FoV and quality. Index has a cable, very noticeable godrays/etc, base stations are points of failures (one of mine died after 1. You can probably take "lightweight" off your list. You can. The index is no doubt great for its time but the cost and resolution just seemed a bit lacking to me when deciding. Each FOV value was then halved and that's what you see in the chart for Up and Down. People exaggerate this. I use position 2 on Quest and felt fine with it from the first day, which actually surprised me since a wider FOV is my most desired feature in any headset. Also, IPD settings are more precise on the Index, so you might get a clearer image on the Index depending on your IPD. Now I know the FOV on the quest isn't great but I don't really notice the borders and haven't really complained about FOV ever until I made research on these two headsets. Just for a couple examples. I'd really like to try a Pimax, but they're so damn big and bulky. Community projects like this and the GearVR mod are great. It does have disadvantages like its price, lower FOV, and considerably smaller refresh rate when compared to the Valve Index. Index is so much more. Imo. -- Sweet Spot --Index has a larger sweet spot, at least easier to find. When switching to the index I notice the better comfort, balance, colors, and ease of use of the index over the pimax. any curved front (v2) base station will work, as valve is the only manufacturer of them, although they, htc, and (i think) pimax resell them. Vertical FoV The rendered vertical FoV is basically the same as on Vive, which means that it is best-in-class for consumer VR HMDs, and a good bit larger than on Rift, Pimax, and non-Samsung WMR HMDs. Over the course of the last year or so, I've had the privilege of owning both the Rift CV1, a Rift S, and as of yesterday, a Valve Index. Depends on what your priorities are. Yes, the image quality was great - when you were in the sweet spot. Edit 2: I totally agree about the horizontal FOV on the Index. Not sure how lenses that increase fov would work out, but I was very pleased w the quality of the lenses from vr optician. The main draw to the index to me is probably the controllers but I've read that the Quest 3 will be better technically speaking which of course is understandable considering the Indexs age. I’m only using it for sim racing, however, so what does get cut off in fov thankfully makes me feel like I just have a helmet on instead. SteamVR and the Valve Index are so smooth, but Oculus Link / Airlink are terribly laggy and feel like a huge stepdown. The HP G2 reverb is pretty phenomenal at A$850. A lot of reviews say they have never got the full 130 FOV valve had marketed because of the above reasons. Valve not say 130 FOV, you say 130 FOV, i really like this marketing. 106° for an average person. Quest 2 has higher res (no screen door effect on Quest 2 but Index has it), lower FOV (unsure if true with prescription lenses), and barely lower refresh than Index. 157 votes, 12 comments. The G2 is a better headset for beginners and someone looking for a more affordable headset though, it's essentially a cheaper valve index. The universal FOV fix also takes care of the few other instances where my previous releases of the mod failed to get the perfect FOV for VR (notably while aiming down sights, entering a car, and a few other scripted animations). Fov is way more important than resolution a RGB pixel array is a must for good colours. So, they should be installed upright, orientation matters. Index is still nice for low latency/smoothness, but the Q3 just looks so much better at high resolution and with the lenses. As far as price, they have not raised it in years in spite of 20% inflation since 2019. The fiberobtic light cable option is awesome and the lightest vr cable out of them all. 30 votes, 15 comments. But the Transition between the Valve Index and Pico 4 is quite the opposite. So we need to make some assumptions. The new Rift S has a "slightly larger FOV" than its predecessor, but it don't believe its specific horizontal FOV has been confirmed. , 0 - 50 degrees) and defined by a second Fresnel pattern having a second associated focal length for relatively large FOV angles (e. Maybe there's a very very small difference in build that is allowing for very slightly increased FOV, that we can't see in photos alone? Don't know. A lot more than the rift s though, but it all depends on your IPD for the rift s as it's fixed. The horizontal FOV of the Index is somewhere in between Vive with extra thin face mask and pimax small (120°) mode. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Index has fov = 108°/130 The FOV of 102 only feels small on paper. The index has a much higher vertical fov, but maybe just a little but wider than the cv1. When using the medium preset (150 degree FOV) option, no partial rendering was present. The colours were nicer, the FOV was wider, there was almost no noticeable screen door effect, it was amazing. be defined by a first Fresnel pattern having a first associated focal length for relatively small fields of view (FOV) angles (e. Features 108° FoV, 1440x1600 per eye resolution, 144 Hz refresh rate, 6 DoF tracking. The Valve Index website says the Index "provides 20° more FOV than the HTC Vive for typical users. The the left and right edges of the rendered FOV appear to be lined up almost perfectly. It's the current theory based on the patent, the new Index Logo, and the heavy use of index of refraction happening here. vive. S. in order for valve to keep 90+ hz and substantially increase the actually displayed resolution, it'd have to use something besides displayport v1. On all the older HMDs listed, they are comparable to looking through binoculars. The G2's sweetspot (clarity) is larger than without mod. If D=50 mm, then IPD=67. But, there is only a 10 degree FOV difference between the Index and Vive Pro and, to me, the visual difference dramatic. I recently had both the Index and my 5K+ with KDMAS as was considering switching to the Index, but the FOV wins over the Index easily. 5 watts) of power output. Also its not appropriate for sharing because the faceplate is customized. The Index has adjustable eye relief which from my understanding is the same as the Vive lens distance adjustment. Thank you u/ThisPlaceisHell for clarifying that this is a comparison of the eye relief system. The Index screens aren't amazing in resolution or contrast, but the FOV and framerate are better than most others. you cant even play wired with the quest 3 for infinite amount of time, unlike with the valve index. Measured as a square that would make the Index having a 41% bigger fov - and that's a massive difference. Thanks for putting together the guide and sharing! :) I was originally planning on doing that too. Some of the WMRs are becoming pretty good, it's where I cut my teeth in VR. The refresh rate is nothing to write home about either. Index has big fov, awesome sound, you can play in a dark room, full IPD slider, silent with no active fan blowing inside the hmd and perfect tracking with the best VR controllers you can get - Quest 2 has none of that. 35*diameter. The Quest 3 can also link to a PC, and better yet, can do so wirelessly! No wires to trip over (Index is a wired headset). I went from a Gen 1 HTC Vive to Valve Index and the visual quality is much better when it comes to the screen door effect. on paper, it seems like the quest 3 is going to be a worthy upgrade. The FOV on those things is insane. The pro is a nice middle ground of screen door vs true black issue index has. It seems like the best options are the Oculus Quest 2 and the Valve Index, but I'm a bit confused by the price difference. It seems you're new here, so we'd like to introduce you to some helpful community resources: Discord Channel: Connect with fellow VR enthusiasts in our vibrant Discord community! For discussion of the Valve Index. Index, Quest 2, Reverb G2, Odyssey+, OG Vive, Cosmos (not elite) I daily drive my Index, but I would say Q2 (assuming you use a wireless solution) delivers 80->90% of the experience. Q2 is very promising with wireless pcvr, resolution is higher. Yeah it is strange I wonder why there's a difference. I'm just wondering whether it should be the quest 3 or valve index (which i would buy from Gamestop). Bottom line, if Quest and Index were the same price I'd still pick the Quest, let alone the fact that it's triple the price of the Quest. Steam VR does not create a map your room but it does give you a top down 2D map of your play area once you set it up. Also it makes the whole VR experience smoother, being able to take off the headset quickly and read the screen easily is Welcome to the Ender 3 community, a specialized subreddit for all users of the Ender 3 3D printer. I second VR optician. Besides refresh rate and a tiny amount of latency it is not really much different from the Index honestly. It's a useful enthusiast feature along with the world scale option and specially for sims. Total 2880×1600. (IE fully extended vs not) Amazing what 1cm of movement can do for your vertical FOV. coach Vive Pro's base stations (same as Valve Index's full kit) has fovs of: horizontal 150° and vertical 110°, based on this HTC's quide [www. I hope that mine also go away with some usage, and below is a 25% grey gradient that works as a excellent test to see if this is affecting your headset. This thing is amazing for a FOV and it uses the index controllers and base stations. The Index FoV is surprisingly usable. Oled is king. 0s have. Valve and HTC were both adverting their FOV measurements diagonally while everyone were measuring horizontally. Thoughts on the Quest 3 vs the Valve Index? Discussion ive had an index, since 2020 and have loved it. Quest 3 is overall the 'better' experience and I think that's mainly due to the increased (a lot) resolution. Sorry for the necro but this appeared as the second result when I googled this. The main things I adore about the valve index compared to the quest 2 are: Wide FOV, Great Audio, seamless SteamVR. All they have done, and all of those animations on that page are explaining how they did it, is make it so that users can see 100% of the rendered FOV, which Valve operates primarily focusing on what addresses the needs of what the user might want. Most people just dont see 110 Fov in Vive, their eyes 25-27 mm from lenses. " So it's simple to calculate the Valve Index FOV, right? Just add 20° to 110° and you get 130°! See full list on thevr. The simplest way is to get a pow This is why the best upgrade I've had since my index arrived a few days ago are contacts. It's cost has gone down in real terms. thus valve is likely waiting for displayport 2. VR games are not any different in the Index FOV opposed to say the smaller Quest 2 FOV. Oculus Link / Airlink are really bad on an AMD GPU, not sure if it is as bad on NVIDIA. Maybe some improved facial interfaces and straps will change that but for now I think the index is still the most comfortable hmd available with the Quest Pro close, but in a different kind of way. I cancelled my order for the Index once the G2 was announced and glad I did. fov is higher, the index only has 110 The resolution and new lenses make up for the best screen to date (apart from maybe the 3000$ xtals) , valve index can't even compete with this. So the FOV of the Pimax helps with its image quality and the lens design are pretty impressive, I've never struggled with distortion (but I never run the 5k+ in "large" FOV, I prefer So we need to make some assumptions. The index has the best visuals imo, and even though the resolution may be lower than that of the quest 2, the sharpness and more accurate colors plus increased fov make up for it. highest PPD/clarity on the market, higher FOV than the index (12k highest FOV period), inside out tracking or basestation tracking (with a module), wired or wireless or wigig (with a module The valve index on vrcompare actually HAS LESS FOV THAN THE Q3 so you are literally just SPREADING LIES NOW? cmon dude, the index had its time, but it’s outdated, even in the pcvr department there’s much better, let it go man, and slandering other headsets isn’t gonna make the index gain more fans. Related Valve Index Virtual Reality headset Virtual reality Gaming forward back r/canon Welcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. Both Feature Steam Tracking. Pretty incredible stuff. Conclusion: Valve Index with symmetrical lenses will have only maximum 50-52 mm lenses diameter like Vive and horizontal FOV 107. Rift S and Quest outright come with facial interface spacers because Oculus is too damn cheap to pay for slide rails. It's the best way to be able to see and maximize FOV. The index has a technical 110° horizontal fov, in comparison, the quest 3 has a 108° H. Having gone through all the Oculus HMDs from DK1 to the Rift S (which I absolutely love), the Vive and PSVR (I love this headset as well; another topic), the Index FOV increase is very noticeable. 90K subscribers in the ValveIndex community. The Index also requires way less distortion to give that FoV (potentially not requiring distortion shaders at all like OSVR) and while the panels are 1440P rather than 2. The greater FOV is not that noticeable and in this case I'll take the better more noticeable change in resolution over marginal FOV. For discussion of the Valve Index. Advertisement Coins. I'd rather wear the Index all day every day compared to the Quest 3. It actually doesn't matter at all which positions OP uses, as it will not affect coverage as long as nothing is obstructing the view - which if they are placed high enough, shouldn't be an issue with either choice of Ultimately glasses or lenses will reduce the FOV because of the space occupied, making it harder to get your eyeballs to the screen, which is what Index wants you to do to enjoy the marketed FOV. Index's FOV is wider, roughly the same in height, noticeable but not a huge difference. I'd happily trade a little bit of FOV for a better value. For me I would not want a ln FOV any smaller than the index. VR is far and away the coolest thing I have seen implemented in gaming today. Real tests show that true hFOV of Valve's HMD is approx. The FOV on the Index is horizontal, the Pro 2 has an almost identical FOV when actually used, the facial interface for the Index limits FOV depending on the shape/size of your face and whether your eye relief is smaller/bigger. Recalculate the projection matrix to return a wider FOV. My girlfriend is currently playing Tilt Brush and its very hard for me to guide her since the FOV real sucks. Main things I noticed were that the Index had better colors, better cable (bit longer, separates and higher quality), smaller, nicer audio cable integration. Please just not wait 135 FOV. Comfort wise the index is still better, but I assume when I purchase the Bobo m3 kit that will no longer be a concern. I explain my method of measuring my personal FOV area in this post of mine from three years The subreddit for all things related to Modded Minecraft for Minecraft Java Edition --- This subreddit was originally created for discussion around the FTB launcher and its modpacks but has since grown to encompass all aspects of modding the Java edition of Minecraft. You are not actually reducing PPD, you are just limiting your FOV by increasing the distance away from a viewing hole. It is necessary to mod the game itself because the game will not render anything past the set FOV. - Performance: Both perform well on test PC with a 2080TI and i9 CPU but Pimax software is buggy and needs lots of tinkering to get a decent frame rate while Index I have a HTC Vive Pro w/lens mod/wifi adapter/index controllers, Quest 2, Pico 4, and my buddy has an Index. 0 base stations have 160⁰ (wide) FOV, and this is plenty to cover all angles from either the A or B positions. Base stations don't view, they broadcast coverage area. It is fairly uncommon for people to actually sustain a "real" 144 refresh on Index and Quest 2 can do 120. If you got his far without ordering an Index, stop, go order one right now, lol. Get the Reddit app btw according to valve's page the fov for the LH2 is 160º x 115º The BMR audio solution of course is insane and even rivals my $1000 audiophile setup. But yeah it doesn't make any real world difference. Increase the FOV so far and you start to lose clarity. Here, enthusiasts, hobbyists, and professionals gather to discuss, troubleshoot, and explore everything related to 3D printing with the Ender 3. Like Valve filed for some oddly specific patents a few months ago (in south korea), and a bunch of them where related to wireless transfer low latency of large ammounts of data (Like a wireless PCVR headset would need to achive resolutions only achived by wired systems today), position tracking related hardware without the need of a base station, and some tech that MIGHT be usable to track the I've almost pulled the trigger on a used Index set a few times, but $500-600 is still too much, even though Valve is the only company realistically committed to supporting VR on Linux. Everything else besides the screen and FOV are better than the Pimax. The panels are also of significantly lower quality and top With 85% brightness on the index the fov upgrade was worth it in that game even though the blacks get washed out a bit. The Oculus Quest 2 seems to offer a significantly higher resolution, the same refresh rate, and optional wireless mode at a fraction of the cost. At the moment I felt that it's a massive downgrade but after using it for a week or two I got used to it and I don't feel like it's small. Lenses were dirty, overall just not good. But you'll have the lenses pressed up against your eyes. . htc's are $50 per device more expensive, don't come with stand or wall mounts, and have a shorter power cable. How about how much FOV can you tell is obscured? They look like they take a large amount from the install video on the site. The Valve Index is a PC-powered VR headset, released 2019. The FoV helps in a dogfight so my neck didn't have to crane around at excessive angles. Okay the Valve Index is 1440×1600/eye. My only issue however is from what I've seen of the Meta Quest Pro it is more oriented towards "Business-Use" and mixed reality features, both of which I don't care about and just serve as A wider FOV squeezed into a smaller physical FOV causes severe motion sickness and headache. While the FOV is larger than most HMDs available, the black around the lenses are still noticeable at any given time. FOV was okay at best, taking was terrible in anything other than perfect lighting (G2 uses visible light, so a room that is too bright or too dim directly impacts tracking. The Beyond headset solves most of the problems with that, except for the biggest one, the FOV. Resolution aside, narrow fov makes me feel like I’m in a diving suit and not only takes me out of the experience but also makes me feel rather claustrophobic. I heard the Pimax can also go up to 180hz if you use a lower FOV which is something I'd definitely consider. Got widmo VR lenses for an Index at work and was not happy with the quality. First of all, I wanted to thank everyone who gave me tips and assisted me in setting up my Valve Index Room play area. Also base station tracking, but I know that can be used with other headset fairly easily too. As far as Index FOV, they achieve this by using dual element lenses (stacked lenses) and moving the lens as close to the eye as possible. This is one of the reasons Valve doesn't give an outright FOV rating because this changes your FOV and simply says "20 degrees better than your Vive" instead of "it's 130deg after all. Getting a tiny bit further away doesn't even change the FOV in this case. I find my eyes strain using the G2, and looking around with my eyes it becomes obvious that the G2 has a much worse edge clarity. Apr 29, 2020 · Comfortable to wear, excellent tracking, high refresh rate, excellent resolutions, decent FOV, and good sound. Edit: also the tracking of the controllers would get lost 10-20% of the time. Members Online Steam Hardware Survey October 2023: Index reaches a new max with 21. I fired up testhmd, and to my surprise, vertical fov I get is only 88 degrees, while horizontal fov is 106 degree which is expected. That's the main thing turning me off the Index as it has the exact same screen resolution as the Quest but better FOV. And Valve just advertased 20 more FOV for average human, not 110+20, but 90+20. I just got my Index and immediately noticed that vertical fov is just like all other headsets. The clarity is amazing and it has the exact same headphones as the Index. 110 degree. FOV that comes from Index neutral position reaches so high that it actually is blocked by my eyebrows. The maximum rendered FOV is the same as the Vive (it's actually a bit less vertical FOV as you can see), nothing they've done has increased the amount of FOV being displayed from the game. Enough for me to box my Vive Pro and use my Index for over a year. Setup, ironically, was far less cumbersome than one may initially believe despite the additional steps required for the Index. In this case you would technically lose a bit FOV. x outputs. In the Index colors look a tiny big washed out in comparison. For example the Steam deck was to address the pc handheld market which they definitely popularized it. Results - JDI panels 2160 x 2432 per eye with 120deg FOV = 18 The Meta Quest Pro offers a higher resolution than the Valve Index's lackluster 1440 x 1600 per eye and its FOV while not quite on par, is still very good. Surprised nobody has said this yet but IMO for PC the HP Reverb G2 is the best bang for your buck these days ($400 less than the Index). The FOV was marginally better. 3 app choices to link to your PC: Airlink/Questlink, Steamlink, and Virtual Desktop Quest 3 has: Higher resolution displays New “pancake” lenses are far better than Index’s Fresnel lenses (huge win) No wires Not everyone really cares that much about the higher resolution of the Quest 3 relative to the Valve Index. The Rift CV1 only has 90 degrees FOV horizontally (this is completely different than diagonal FOV, which is 110 degrees), while the Vive Pro is 110 degrees horizontally. 5 years which cost $150 to replace), Index controllers are awesome but are unsupported in some games and in other games you need to manually remap the grip/pressure sensor inputs to work well, if you need prescription lenses the FOV is Besides all that I use the 5KS at 160hz which gives a little bit larger fov than the index (5KS fov gets smaller at higher refresh settings). The index controllers are also better for me, but once my knuckle straps arrive for Q3 that may change. Also, how is shipping (to the US mainly)? I'm going to order at least the Plano lenses so my glasses don't scratch the index's but appointment is far away due to all the crazy. I have dailies so I throw them away after playing and go back to my glasses. Where as Index full FoV is 110 Wide(think 109 see Hmdq database). Likewise, not everyone cares that the Valve Index has a higher refresh rate. I have a 3080ti, a Quest 2 and index. However, when it does work, it is the BEST for sim racing or flight sims since no other HM The edges of the Index are well within what I'm accustomed to so I probably notice these issues more than someone coming from a lower FOV headset to the Index. If the game you're playing has it's own crappy mirror, try to move the SteamVR mirror to a secondary monitor or drag the game's mirror off screen somewhere. It works for the most part, but the mirrored content shown on the TV is zoomed in much farther than the FOV actually shown when wearing the headset. The lenses are so much better than the index, same with the removal of godrays. Plus, lenses that have crap quality are still going to look like crap in a larger FOV. Quest 3 absolutely, valve index has a very bad resolution and it's getting older, for price and advanced tech i think quest 3 it's way better than Valve Index, it's also portable and can do pcvr too. Even if fov is better with Quest 3 than Quest 2, Index still has bigger fov too, especially vertically. I actually have a Quest 2 and it's great, i use it for pcvr, and when quest 3 comes out im going to buy it without thinking about it xD The expanded FoV is based on being able to adjust the headset so your eyes are closer to the screen, but not everyone will be able to get their eyes as far in as possible (which is how you get the advertised FoV). This will merge both eyes into one wide FoV mirror for spectators to see and get a good idea of what you see. What it displays towards the edges is definitely not clear / readable off-axis (no VR headsets are that I know of, perhaps Varjo, but that's not a real option), but awareness--particularly SA is definitely improved. So I don't think it's particularly helpful to make comments like yours that the Valve Index is clearly a worse headset. MRTV measured Quest 2 to 90 degrees horizontal and 112 degrees vertical. For example, make a circle with your index finger and thumb, and move it close you your eye and then slowly outward. obviously, units haven't shipped yet, but do yall think it'd be a worthy upgrade these days? no controller based finger tracking on the quest though which is kinda stinky I appreciate the bigger FOV the Index offers, but I still feel like I'm wearing a scuba mask in VR. This guide is an overview of how you can add LEDs to your exisiting HMD (Valve index or otherwise) and use an Arduino and capture software to augment a wider field of view for better comfort in VR and a better sense of presence, experiences may vary depending on how many LEDs you use and how sensitive you are to light. Using my Index is a noticeably smoother and more immersive experience than my Quest2 (ignoring the tethered vs untethered aspect). The index is the tried, true, best all around headset even today. Is it known problem for people with big head/deep eyes? Will VRCover gasket with thin foam improve vertical fov? The Index is a decent way to go if you can stomach the cost. If you have some programming and math skills you can try to modify the below mod to do this. Pimax 8KX: Almost always takes some troubleshooting to get working. I am hoping Index 2 has wireless + wider FOV so that these kinds of things aren't as big of a compromise. Im currently using the pro to play through subnautica below zero vr mod and its amazing even with a gamepad. Before that I had the original HTC Vive, and the Valve Index. 5K, the Pimax panel utilization due to the medium FoV mask and distortion shaders all but eliminate that advantage. Here's what Valve says about that: The FOV rendered by the GPU for Index is similar to that of a Vive or Vive Pro, but more of that view is delivered to most users. Setup. Pimax crystal should be coming in a month or so. It takes higher resolution panels to fill a higher FOV and have the same image quality as the Index at its lower FOV. 0 trackers and 3 base stations, and have also added a face tracker to my index! The extra fov the index offers is well worth it imo. I think there might be other lower cost headsets you can get your hands on if you are looking into something cheaper. 109° is theoretical maximum. The Quest 2 is SIGNIFICANTLY sharper than the Index when both are running uncompressed native resolution content (because it has way more pixels spread over a smaller FOV), and has DRAMATICALLY better lenses! FOV is similar to the Index which is the highest redeeming quality. ynakhdk juroiprd nky qrojmh amspd itwh dlj qtis hnia ffulh